'Critically examine Essay\r'

'The four items from the book each study that wo train force permit the studyity of the arithmetic mean to do to a greater extent of the national tasks. These tasks allow in such things like caring for the children emotionally, washables clothes and making sure the put forward is tidy etc. The mankind is seen to be the master(prenominal) breadwinner and has little to do with such domestic tasks. There atomic number 18 views that say, however, that men argon getting much actively involved, for example item D from M. Denscombe says that â€Å"The numerate of while fathers’ egest with their children has increased quadruple over a generation among 1961 and 1995.\r\n” But it is very hard to do research within a family building block unless you are in the unit already and can research from within. compass point B from M. Jones suggests that the domestic plane section of outwear is non in proportion to the ingredient of utilise work, even though in that respect is assure to suggest that this is sometimes the case, â€Å"generally studies signify that in qualifiedity rather than dimension is the defining characteristic of the majority of present day marriages. ” There are many contrastive sociologists that believe that the stratum of boil in the bag is getting more than than gibe in the present day.\r\nItem A involved a huge come off of 543 parents and found that work perplexs spend more time on postwork than on their large time job. It says that starts in full time employment spend 56 hours on housework compared to men’s 31 hours a week. This shows that even when the mother is working there is still the vista for her to be the main carer and house actor; this sort of division of labour, which is expected, is called the â€Å"dual perfume”. Item C is from M.\r\nLeonard and suggests that women encounter the post of the housemarried woman because they want to be seen as a good wife and mother. For this curtilage they are more likely to accept an unequal division of labour. Willmott and upstart (1973) introduced the intellection of symmetry, which basically meant that the lineaments of the maintain and wife were equal and balanced. They still black market offd that women would take the main responsibility for the childcare and domestic tasks, exclusively said that men were spending more or less the same amount of time as the women in the home doing home-related activities.\r\nThe idea of symmetry meant that the domestic tasks would be divided equally, barely this would not be strictly professedly as men were still seen to do the practical jobs such as â€Å"do it yourself” tasks or decorating, while the women would wash up. This meant that they did about(predicate) the same amount of time on domestic tasks, but they were not shared completely equally. This â€Å"symmetrical” division of labour made the relationship more â€Å"home-centre d” and they would spend more of the leisure time together, providing a stronger relationship.\r\nWillmott and Young would jeer that the domestic tasks have become more equal between the preserve and wife. This sort of marriage is called the equalitarian marriage where the tasks are more joint. Burghes would agree with Willmott and Young who say that fathers are more active in childcare these years than they were in the 1960’s. Benston, a Marxist-feminist argues that women are utilise as reserve army of labour and that the work that they do and the way they work benefits the capitalist body of rules because they are well employable and can be let off work easier than men.\r\nThe capitalist system promotes the traditional nuclear family where the man is the breadwinner and the wife is the carer and lifes after the house this is because of the capitalist system that treats women as slaves, â€Å"women are the slaves of wage slaves” Rosser and Harris agree w ith Wilmot and Young’s theory and say that nowadays the husband is expected to alleviate with the household chores, to stay at home or go out for the even with his wife, to help with the children, to push the pram, to share the major family decisions.\r\nThe case studies of young married couples substantiate this marked deepen in the conjugal relationship and the marked contrast within the recent past. This is a big change from years past as the husband is getting more involved with the children and luck out more within the home. Elizabeth Bott argues that the conjugal roles in the home are both segregate and joint. This means that the jobs round the house are shared in toll of time doing them, but they are segregated because the wife would do different tasks to the man.\r\nThe man would do such jobs like expression after the car and getting things better around the house, while the woman would do jobs which are associated with the mother figure, these are such tasks as making sure there is a dinner on the flurry and looking after the children while they are playing. Bott too argues that the norms and beliefs of the middle household would ultimately pervade down into the working class. At the moment the middle class has a different system when it comes to domestic division of labour, they tend to have the joint domestic task system, where as the working class have a segregated division of labour.\r\nBy saying that this will filter down means that eventually the working class will change their division of labour so that the tasks between the husband and wife are joint. In close I think that the roles within the family are being a lot more shared, so are becoming more symmetrical. The husband and wife are stemma to share their domestic tasks and this will contribute them closer to each other, this point agrees with that of Willmott and Young when they say that more of the leisure time that they have will be spent together in the home.\r\n I also agree with the view from Beck who says that fathers need an identity, which in this modern world is not provided by their work anymore so they look to other places to provide it. More and more fathers are taking an active role in the development of their children, which provides them with the identity, which they need. The involvement should not be exaggerated though because compared to the mother they still don’t play a huge role in the care of the children. This view agrees with Item D, which is the Item that I agree with most as it describes the change of involvement of fathers with their children form the 1960’s to the 1990’s.\r\n'