Articles Of Confederation :: essays research papers

Articles of union     It would have been very difficult to run an effective government netherthe Articles of Confederation. Many of the great minds politic tout ensembley active afterthe American gyration realized this thus arrived the birth of iodine of the superior political documents of all time The Constitution. With the implementof the Constitution, the United States government became effective.     The professional personduct of some of the greatest minds to ever exist in this world,the Articles did have some positive effectuate on beau monde. It successfully put anend to the Revolutionary War, it negotiated a sociable end to the war in theTreaty of Paris, and created a model for the accession of new territoriescourtesy of the Northwest Ordinance. Nonetheless, it was much too weak to conk outthe new nation the necessary foundation on which the growth of society could bestarted from.     For one thing, any amen dment of the Articles required a unanimous suffragethroughout the colonies. Since this was almost impossible, there always beingtwo sides to everything a pro and a con, changing the Articles to eliminatethe ideas that did non function properly was approach impossible. Another factor ofthe Articles ineffectiveness was that Congress was in essence fix in itsauthority. After the war, the colonists trusted no ultimate authority not evenone they designed. It could not regulate commerce, so what resulted wasthirteen colonies with diametrical taxations and tariff laws. This only added tothe already present feelings of dislike and distrust which had existed betwixtthe colonies since they were first established.     After this period of eight years, the "Critical Period", the groundless atthe end of the tunnel arrived with Thomas Jefferson writing the Constitution.It delegated the power, at the treat of the people. It was designed to beamended the great min ds who designed it realized that they themselves were notinfallible, and could make mistakes. The beauty of the Constitution was that itallowed for these mistakes. Instead of the outrageous unanimous right to vote of statesto change it, two-thirds of Congress and then three-fourths of the states mustapprove. It ensured that no one section of government could grow so powerful tothe point that it could be considered a Parliament through the Checks and