Compare how each writer uses language to present his views of London Essay

For patchy centuries capital of the United Kingdom has been a vast, building complex place. Many have described it as the capital of the world, however in that respect are many different views. Some would agree that London is a wonderful place where e very(prenominal)one lives in happiness and peace whereas some other would top out that those kind of mountain are delirious and that it is the dirtiest most corrupted place in England. Two such views were expressed by devil poets William Wordsworth in his song named Composed upon Westminster Bridge, 3rd September 1802 and the more political writer William Blake with his poem entitled London. The questions is, Do both poets substance abuse language solutionively to express their contradictory opinions on London? matchless difference between the two poems is the way each uses enjambrement. Blakes poem has short, snappy lines perhaps to indicate a kind of overall lethargy among the pile while Wordsworths poem has long lines whic h flow into each other to create a smooth and relaxed mood possibly also to lay out how he viewed the river of London.One of the interesting aspects of Wordsworths and Blakes poems is their separate ship back endal of describing the river, Wordsworth thinks of it as gliding at his own concoction will whereas Blake refers to it as the lockd Thames. Wordsworth sees the river as free and sweet. By using his, he is personifying the river as if it has a choice. He resurrects this by using own sweet will. Blake calls it Chartered, indicating the complete opposite of Wordsworths opinion. Chartered means unionised and generally bent to mans will and this is how Blake sees it. He raise pay backs his opinion by calling it the Thames, calling it by its man made name. Blake sees the river as being twisted by man and dislike because of that.Blake and Wordsworth focalize two very different scenes, Wordsworth uses phrases such as brilliant and glistening in the smokeless air and The bea uty of the forenoon silent, unmistakable to set a scene of calmness glistening beauty, to set a scene of a kind of fairy-tale wonderland. Wordsworth shows the reader how the surroundings spring him get by commenting Neer I saw, never felt, a calm so deep this gives a further direct tranquillise effect on the reader. Blake, on the other hand, uses the word streets twice in context of use with midnight and Charterd. His repetition on the word streets is to indicate that there are streets upon streets, creating a monotonous sameness to everything, his repetition on Charterd strengthens his view of unnaturalness in London.An intriguing observation is that both poets call on the carpet of glamorous and gracious buildings, but the context they are mentioned in changes their unharmed meaning. Wordsworth describes them as being Open unto the fields and to the sky indicating a certain(p) freeness and naturalness, he is tell that buildings can be natural if natural is like with g ood, as Blakes man made is synonymous with bad. Blake uses Palace with subscriber line and Church with blackning, he is indicating that the people of the Church have done for(p) against its morals and the people of the Palace are sending soldiers to their final stage for unworthy reasons.Blake and Wordsworth set two very different scenes, Wordsworth uses phrases such as bright and glistening in the smokeless air and The beauty of the morning silent, jame to set a scene of calm glistening beauty, to set a scene of a kind of fairy-tale wonderland. Wordsworth shows the reader how the surroundings make him feel by commenting Neer I saw, never felt, a calm so deep this gives a further direct calming effect on the reader. Blake, on the other hand, uses the word streets twice in context with midnight and Charterd. His repetition on the word streets is to insinuate that there are streets upon streets, creating a monotonous sameness to everything, his repetition on Charterd strengthens hi s view of unnaturalness in London.Both writers enhance their conniption by hinting at colourizes to set a more graphic picture. Blood, midnight, blackning, are all words used by Blake, suggestions of the colour red and black which create a gloomy surrounding. bolshie (blood) as in anger and black to suggest darkness, sorrowfulness and endlessness. Wordsworth suggests colour with a more subtle method using Never did the insolate more beautifully steep he hints at gold and fulgent white colours, and also at cool shade coming from the buildings.Wordsworths hoarfrost scheme is planned out as a making love sonnet (a b b a a b b a c d c d c d), whereas Blake exigent and simple rhyme scheme ( a b a b a b a b a b a b a b a b a b). Wordsworth rhyme scheme is writing a love sonnet about London whereas Blakes rhyme scheme evokes a boring repetitiveness thus far again synonymous with how Blake views London.The final difference mentioned in this essay is that whereby Blake mentions s ort of a few different groups of people such as cyprian, Soldier, Chimney Sweep, Infant all unfortunate groups bar the infant which is mentioned in an unfortunate context repetitively Wordsworth mentions no people but instead personifies the river (The river glideth at his own sweet will), the urban center (This city now doth like a garment wear, The very houses seem asleep) and the sun (In his first Splendour). Wordsworth, whilst making it evident that there is no one around but himself, is saying the city, the river and the sun are all entities of which he has just met and thinks highly of them.In conclusion, both poets are high-quality writers who know how to use language effectively to enhance their views. Although Blake is a deeper, darker and more political writer and his poem seems to be the damp of the two, Wordsworth poem does have complexity going to a slightly deeper take than Blakes but it seems naive and idealistic. Blake uses simple rhyme schemes and repetition t o develop his opinion but Wordsworth uses a more complex rhyme scheme whilst subtly personifying parts of the city. With that said, both artists were good at what they did and both can use language to successfully articulate their attitudes toward London.