Justice :: essays research papers

JusticeShould the strong be required to support the shaky? How does society "distribute"wealth among its members? These atomic number 18 the questions. There are troika basic sidesto this issue. The permissive system entitles individuals to a subsistenceincome supply for existing as a human. The puritan system requires that peopleat least be willing to contribute to society in order to receive a subsistenceincome. Finally, the Individual view holds the belongings rights of the individualto be sacred no one may forcibly deprive him of his goods. I will get by for thelast alternative.Individualism is an extension of Lockes idea of property rights. AnIndividualist believes for each one person owns his own life, the fruits of his labor,and his property. No one may deprive him of these property rights. He is free toact as long as his actions do non interfere with the property rights of others.At this point it is important to countersink what money is. Money is an exchange ofvalue. Money has value because it represent labor, or value, one has created butnot yet used. Money in my goop is what I have created but not yet consumed.Money is not a natural resource it does not grow on trees. workforce can make moneyby their physical or rational labor. Do I not, then, have full claim to myearnings?If A discovers a reanimate for AIDS it surely was not solely a product of A.Societys framework made the husking possible A had to piss on previousknowledge she had to use a laboratory she likely did not own. All of thesefactors make society a partner in the discovery. Therefore, she does not havethe right to all of the benefits of her discovery she must bankrupt up some of herbenefits to society at large.It is true that A did not personally create every piece of equipment she used tomake the discovery however, the point missed by in this situation is thatproperty is held by individuals, and A had to exchange value in the form ofmoney to secure or rent the equipment she used. The owners have already been paidfor the use of their equipment. contrast agreements occur between individualsthere is no entity, "society," that handed her a gift. If A were to have to paymore to "society," then she would, in effect, be compensable twice.If a permissivist responds with "but she will get rich selling the cure for ahigh price while thousands are dying," there are basically two responses.