Federal Poverty Lines Essay

The reciprocal issue concerning the annual federal official pauperism aims that argon universal for completely the beginninger forth eight states are that the meagerness level measures are limited. In early(a) words, the meagerness wands doesnt represent a cypher for raw material necessities of life nor it addresses the supplementary amount  to allow for other basic needs such as household supplies, person care, etc(Madden, 182). Also, the federal penury lines by family size do not use consumer expenditure selective information and it is not updates. It is not adjusted by family types and geographical differences in trapping concepts.Problems with Absolute national Poverty LevelAbsolute federal meagerness level is enumerates the numeral value of people below destitution threshold which does not depend on time and place (Madden, 183). In other words, it is constant quantity. It is incorrect to calculate absolute federal poorness level because it is entirely pos sible because the amount of wealth essential for survival is not constant for all places and time periods.  For example, a person alive Alaska requires oftentimes sources of love because of its cold climate whereas a person living in howdy does not. As compared to absolute federal poverty level, relative poverty level is dependent on time and place (Madden, 183).Poverty Levels, Family Size and address of LivingThe federal administration does not raise the poverty levels by family size to reflect the cost of living of a geographic airfield because the poverty threshold level varies from one place to another. The flow poverty levels by family size are measured by comparing the singulars family income to the essential amount necessary for standard of living (Rogers, 85). It has been employ as the primary statistic by the U.S federal government to allocate mean-tested fond welfare benefits.Expenses in NYC versus Other States forward-looking York City is considered to be the close expensive cities to live in. newfound York remains the most expensive urban center within United States. According to statistics, the median earnings of New York are more that sixty gee dollars which is ten meter dollars greater than the national median. The overall average living expenses in New York are more than one deoxycytidine monophosphate and ninety dollars (Rogers, 185).Housing expenses are more than tercet hundred thousand dollars and secondary breeding is more than two thousand dollars as compared to the nation average. Other facilities are also expensive as compared to other states. For example, a person living in Pittsburg who earns fifty thousand dollars will need one hundred thousands dollars to survive in New York. Over all, living expenses in New York is twice as much as compared to other states.Juvenilization and feminization of PovertyJuvenilization of poverty is has been derived from the word insipid and poverty. Poverty is defined as the sca rcity and deficiency assets, income, capabilities or freedoms. Juvenilization is associated with children. Hence, juvenilization of poverty means that children are deprived of basic necessities of life. According to statistics, one go forth of six children in United States suffers from poverty. Studies also show that more than thirty percent of children are living below poverty line although they firebrand up more than twenty eight percent of the population. The term feminisation of poverty has been originated from the definition of two words which are poverty and feminization.Feminization is the term which illustrates that gender partiality and bias in deprivation of resources, capabilities or freedoms. Hence, feminization of poverty is considered to be a concept which compares male and female and what are the differences or ratios between the two in terms of poverty levels. It represents the inability of women to meet the basic necessities of life.Personal Costs of Poverty and Problems with Federal Approach towards PovertyAccording to the data collected the U.S Census Bureau, the private costs of poverty on family and children of four is $22,050 per course of study and for family of eight is $37010 per year and for every additional personal $ 3740 is added (Madden, 196). There are certain sets of particular policies and programs which are flawed because they johnnot fight poverty. Aid to Families with Dependent Children has provided families with cash lookant but it comprises about one percent of the federal budget.AFDC polices concur dear weaknesses which makes the poverty rate higher as compared to other countries. The weaknesses in the current policies can be classified into two broad categories namely, inadequate inhabitable wage jobs and inadequate tender welfare policies. The AFDC policies do not have policies which guarantee childcare for families who are living below two hundred percent of poverty. It doesnt have policies which countena nce child survive and low incoming individuals. Other problems include lack of workforce education and training programs, benefits and inadequate job policies.Social Work and Poverty and Modifications in Federal PoliciesAs a social worker, I will apply my social work training in system to understand the nature of poverty and its origin. As a social worker, poverty must be combated at macro level so that pathetic families can afford childcare, housing, cordial health treatment and education and employment opportunities (Rogers, 221).On broader scale, the first affaire to help poor families would be through community organizing in poor neighborhoods. This can help in organizing the communitys asset and mix in them with other resources to create and set up local structure which assist health, education and financial viability. This will empower the community residents to be quick and support local initiatives.In order to reduce poverty, the federal government should recognize an d produce measures to tackle issues of well being beyond the income status. The federal government should introduce a guarantee for child care for families living at or below two hundred percent of poverty in order to correct the quality of child care.It should also assist child support and fathers who have low incomes. In order to annihilate the future generation from poverty, the federal government should increase child support programs and adopt pragmatic policies for low income families. At the same time, workforce education and training programs should be introduced to assist low-income individuals to advance economically. The government should also improve job quality with the help of earnings, benefits and other predictable measures so that workers can meet both work and family responsibilities.Work CitedMadden, David. RELATIVE OR compulsive POVERTY LINES A NEW APPROACH. Review of Income & Wealth 46 (June 2009) 181-199. Rogers, Harrell, R.. American Poverty in a New Era of Reform. New York M.E. Sharpe, Inc., (2006).