Public Administration Essay

Q1 The chief executive of the country, or President, holds the highest office. He cannot make laws but he participates in the legislation process. Although he is the head of pronounce, I agree that the chief executive cannot take for apt(p) that the legislative body, which is relation back, would follow his leave behind on any subject. The President has to breathing in all of his willpower, his charisma, and every advantages available to him to influence the outcome of the legislation process. The theme made sure that the chief executive wont commence absolute power to avoid dictatorship. There atomic number 18 even measure that Congress would overturn the Presidents veto on a particular law.As an example, the current administration of President Bush has goallessly been in favor of attacking countries that pose a threat to the linked States, particularly those countries that are identified as havens for terrorists. President Bush obtained Congress approval on attacking Ir aq and Afghanistan because of what happened in 9/11. Congress concord with the President to redress a wrong-doing and because a successful conclusion to the contend was imminent. Years later, the victory in Iraq was indecisive. Despite the Presidents purview for the troops to stay in Iraq, Congress held out and the chief executive has to concede to the purpose that the troops should be pulled out.Q2 If I have to end the states monopoly on demanding drink sales, my strategy is to engage in massive lobbying efforts employing the best lobbyists in every state. The CEO said notes is not a problem, so, it means that advertising and marketing strategies can in standardised manner be used to slowly influence the mind of the voters. Hard liquors, like tequila, are popular drinks in bars. The campaign should first target those slew who owns bars and their patrons. Whether or not this strategy would field out stiff on how effective the lobbyists are in influencing the right people . The lobbyists I would take up are those who would be good in promoting the benefits of privatization of hard liquor, particularly to the states coffers. The country is in an economic crisis and many states are troubled to meet many programs. With the promise of big tax revenues from the privatization, state officials would make up ones mind ways to relinquish control over hard liquor sales. They would scratch a way to change the law without needing a 60% necessitateance from the public.Calling to mind the reasons why the Prohibition was approved, and why hard liquor sale is regulated by the political science procedure, I would be reminded of the evils of unregulated alcohol selling. In this regard, my personal recommendation is not to allow head-to-head businesses to sell hard liquors. Giving up control on hard liquor could mean a return of the era wherein alcohol consumption caused many of societys ills. There are too many crimes as it is, and unregulated alcohol manufactu ring and selling could worsen the current situation.Q3 The elements of a bureaucracy are statutes legalizing the agencys existence, as well as how it is structured, the type of activities it is in charge with, and the budgets for the agencys operation purpose of what legislative committee is to oversee an agency and what sector of society will the services be delivered to discretionary power resources, how big the agency should be and how will the organization be structured maintaining a close human relationship with the legislative body for its continued existence and survival and the presence of adept leadership and knowledgeable employees.The strength of a bureaucracy lies in its world outside of the limelight in the political arena. An administrative agency has more(prenominal)(prenominal) influence in policymaking when it is not being closely watched. The weakness of a bureaucracy is on its single-mindedness of purpose. If it is created for a particular sector, like the N ational dig out Relations Board for the labor sector, the agency cannot accommodate early(a) requests from the public. eyepatch is this a weakness, it is as well a bureaucracys strength. By cogitate on one aspect of society, an agency can better action the needs of that sector. Another weakness of the bureaucracy is its tendency to respond more promptly to queries from legislators compared to its response to a query from the public. Since an agency is dependent on Congress, it needs to be liked by the members of Congress.The criticisms against a bureaucracy are centered on two things. First, an administrative agencys answerability for failures is comparatively less compared to private businesses. Second, a bureaucracys movement is difficult to gauge because it provides services and creates policies. It cannot be measured based on quantifiable metrics.In my opinion, the main benefit of having administrative agencies is the focus it could work to the community in toll of serv ices. For instance, a bureaucracy is needed to spot the countrys health care. Without a particular administrative agency for health care, people could wait weeks and months before receiving medical service. In terms of challenges, a bureaucracys main challenge is how to become self-sufficing from the influence of legislators. It has to find balance with regards to its dealings with the public and the legislative body.Q4 Federalism is a form of governance wherein the power to govern the nation is not centralized. In the United States, the federal political sympathies does not control how states should implement and take in many laws. They are independent from the federal governments hoo-ha in many aspects, like utility regulation, zoning, come apart, and many others. In other words, each state is empowered to a certain degree. The federal government do not interfere with state matters unless it has reason to. When the federal government needs bigger state control, it often pro vides grants-in-aid to obtain some concessions from the states. Or conversely, the federal government can decrease federal aid to the states. similar in the case of the Medicaid system, the current administration is proposing a cut on its contribution to the program.Federalism is effective in giving each state the decision on how to govern itself based on its peoples needs. Federalism could also be bad when there would be an absence of cooperation among states and between the federal government and the states.Q5 The current high rate of come apart can be attributed to the lack of difficulty in obtaining one since law made it simple for married couples to separate legally and sever the ties of trade union. This is one area where I would work on so that couples cant just divorce one another to the detriment of their children. In order to tighten the law, I would first seek the aid of the church, the local politicians and engage the community in a discussion of my proposal.Before g oing to these people I would already be ready with my own modifications so that we have something concrete to work on. I would present to these people my proposal that I would call the divorce test. The couple should recall this test before any court would accept their filing. The revised divorce law would require the couple to undergo marriage counseling at least twice before they can pass the divorce test. Like in bankruptcy, divorce should be the last recede for couples to take. I would expect some quarters to argue but kind of of debating endlessly, I would ask them to present one of their own proposal. So prospicient as everyone keeps to the objective of keeping families together, a revision could be arrived at that would be fair and equitable to everyone.